lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux 4.2-rc1 broken Nokia N900
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 09:14:12AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 13 July 2015 17:36:07 Michael Welling wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:02:44AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > I think nothing special. I just call:
> > >
> > > export ARCH=arm
> > > export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi-
> > > make rx51_defconfig
> > > rm -f arch/arm/boot/zImage
> > > make -j12 zImage modules omap3-n900.dtb CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y
> > > cat arch/arm/boot/zImage arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dtb > arch/arm/boot/zImage.new
> > > mv arch/arm/boot/zImage.new arch/arm/boot/zImage
> > >
> >
> > Where are you getting rx51_defconfig from?
> >
> > This does not appear to be in the kernel source any longer.
> >
> > Can you try the above with omap2plus_defconfig?
> >
>
> It is in my linux-n900 repository: https://github.com/pali/linux-n900
> Repository contains more n900 specific patches but SPI code is unpatched
>
> https://github.com/pali/linux-n900/blob/HEAD/arch/arm/configs/rx51_defconfig
>
> Later in week I can try to compile also with omap2plus_defconfig...
> But in my opinion kernel should not crash with different configuration.

Has any progress been made on this?

Seeing as I was dropped into the middle of this thread,
I took a look at the discussion previous.

It appears that you are building the drivers as modules.
Perhaps I can again attempt to duplicate the issue using modules.
Though this should not make a difference.

>
> --
> Pali Rohár
> pali.rohar@gmail.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-20 23:21    [W:1.554 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site