Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:43:16 -0400 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] workqueue: avoiding unbounded wq on isolated CPUs by default |
| |
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 05:35:09PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Initializing wq unbound cpumask to housekeeping_mask is still the > plan. I just remember we didn't do it in Lai's series because it > was slightly unrelated. When a patchset is complicated, like Lai's, > it's better to keep it focus to a single purpose. > > Anyway that patch is welcome.
Ah, cool, can you ack it explicitly?
> > Yeah, I think I asked Lai to try a different approach where we > > regulate it from queueing path rather than playing with pwqs. I think > > that'd end up quite a bit simpler. > > Ordered workqueues aren't handled currently? I tried setting the unbound > cpumask and it also applied to khelper which is a singlethread (and thus > ordered) workqueue.
Hmmm... AFAICS, it shouldn't work.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |