lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/2] vTPM: support little endian guests
Date
Hi Vicky,
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juli 2015, 19:54:15 schrieb Hon Ching(Vicky) Lo:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 23:08 +0200, Peter Hüwe wrote:
> > Hi Vicky,
> >
> > sorry for the late reply
> >
> > > This patch makes the code endianness independent. We defined a
> > > macro do_endian_conversion to apply endianness to raw integers
> > > in the event entries so that they will be displayed properly.
> > > tpm_binary_bios_measurements_show() is modified for the display.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hon Ching(Vicky) Lo <honclo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Joy Latten <jmlatten@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > >
> > > b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog.h index e7da086..267bfbd 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog.h
> > > @@ -6,6 +6,12 @@
> > >
> > > #define MAX_TEXT_EVENT 1000 /* Max event string length */
> > > #define ACPI_TCPA_SIG "TCPA" /* 0x41504354 /'TCPA' */
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> > > +#define do_endian_conversion(x) be32_to_cpu(x)
> > > +#else
> > > +#define do_endian_conversion(x) x
> > > +#endif
> >
> > Why is this macro needed?
> > shouldn't the be32_to_cpu macro already do correct thing?
> > Or am I missing something here?
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Peter
>
> The macro is defined to not do the conversion in the architecture
> that does not need it.

Unfortunately I'm still not convinced this is needed?
be32_to_cpu(x)
should already do the right thing if no conversion is needed ? (being defined
as (x))
Or is it not?



Peter


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-16 21:01    [W:0.087 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site