Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:30:14 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] x86/ras material for 4.3 queue |
| |
* Luck, Tony <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:
> Some of these almost made it into 4.2, then we found a bug and > delayed to fix it. Bug fixes have now been merged back into > the original patch series. > > The following changes since commit d770e558e21961ad6cfdf0ff7df0eb5d7d4f0754: > > Linux 4.2-rc1 (2015-07-05 11:01:52 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ras/ras.git tags/please-pull-ras-for-4.3 > > for you to fetch changes up to 60e23e3342d0ff1201e8ce160a3624bd2ce5ff79: > > x86/mce: Clear Local MCE opt-in before kexec (2015-07-06 14:21:12 -0700) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > 1) Chen Gong series to make mce logging safer in #MC context > 2) Boris deleted drain_mcelog_buffer() - don't want/need it now > 3) Ashok fixed a local machine check corner case with kexec > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Ashok Raj (2): > x86/mce: Remove unused function declarations > x86/mce: Clear Local MCE opt-in before kexec > > Borislav Petkov (1): > x86/mce: Kill drain_mcelog_buffer() > > Chen, Gong (4): > x86/mce: Provide a lockless memory pool to save error records > x86/mce: Don't use percpu workqueues > x86/mce: Remove the MCE ring for Action Optional errors > x86/mce: Avoid potential deadlock due to printk() in MCE context
So the SOB chains are messed up in a number of commits:
commit ff7d8f3c477ea2340675179cb8393be5566e4617 Author: Chen, Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed May 20 15:35:35 2015 -0400
Signed-off-by: Chen, Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1432150538-3120-2-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com [ Rewrite. ] Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
did you rebase a tree from Boris?
Also, please send all patches as part of the submission so that I can comment on individual patches as well.
Thanks,
Ingo
| |