lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2] memory-barriers: remove smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()
From
Date
On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 07:18 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:06:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 08:31 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > Michael, at some point you were experimenting a bit with that and tried
> > > to get some perf numbers of the impact that would have, did that
> > > solidify ? Otherwise, I'll have a look when I'm back next week.
> >
> > I was mainly experimenting with replacing the lwsync in lock with an isync.
> >
> > But I think you're talking about making it a full sync in lock.
> >
> > That was about +7% on p8, +25% on p7 and +88% on p6.
>
> Just for completeness, what were you running as benchmark? ;-)

Heh sorry :)

That was my lockcomparison benchmark, based on Anton's original. It just does
100,000,000 lock/unlocks for each type in userspace:

https://github.com/mpe/lockcomparison/blob/master/lock_comparison.c

cheers




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-16 04:01    [W:0.132 / U:0.452 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site