Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:59:10 -0700 | From | Stephen Boyd <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] Input: pmic8xxx-pwrkey - Support shutdown |
| |
On 07/13/2015 05:58 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 07/13/2015 05:46 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 05:34:57PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 07/13/2015 05:25 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >>>>> + >>>>> +static const struct of_device_id pm8xxx_pwr_key_id_table[] = { >>>>> + { .compatible = "qcom,pm8058-pwrkey", .data = >>>>> &pm8058_pwrkey_shutdown }, >>>>> + { .compatible = "qcom,pm8921-pwrkey", .data = >>>>> &pm8921_pwrkey_shutdown }, >>>>> + { } >>>>> +}; >>>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pm8xxx_pwr_key_id_table); >>>>> + >>>> Can we please keep IDs and device table where it was, close to the >>>> driver definition? >>> That would require forward declaring the array here. Is that >>> desired? I moved it so that I could use it in the probe function. >> Ah, yes, OF data is not passed into probe() :(... But we can always do: >> >> match = of_match_device(pdev->dev.driver->of_match_table, >> &pdev->dev); >> >> Maybe we could have a helper for this like: >> >> const struct of_device_id *of_get_current_match(struct device *dev) >> { >> return dev->drv ? >> of_match_device(dev->driver->of_match_table, dev) : >> NULL; >> } > > Nice. I'll update and Cc the OF maintainers. >
Actually, this already exists I just didn't know. See of_device_get_match_data().
-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
| |