lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 22/45] clk: samsung: Properly include clk.h and clkdev.h
On 14.07.2015 05:42, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/11/2015 12:07 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> W dniu 11.07.2015 o 08:33, Stephen Boyd pisze:
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
>>> index 0117238391d6..f38a6c49f744 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
>>> @@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
>>> * clock framework for Samsung platforms.
>>> */
>>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>>> +#include <linux/clkdev.h>
>>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>>> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>>> #include <linux/of_address.h>
>>> #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
>>> index b775fc29caa5..aa872d2c5105 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
>>> @@ -13,10 +13,11 @@
>>> #ifndef __SAMSUNG_CLK_H
>>> #define __SAMSUNG_CLK_H
>>> -#include <linux/clkdev.h>
>>> #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>>> #include "clk-pll.h"
>>> +struct clk;
>>> +
>> Hmmm... why? Including clk-provider (which declares struct clk in your
>> last patch) is not sufficient?
>>
>
> I hope to eventually remove the forward declaration of struct clk in
> clk-provider.h too. That will take some more time though. I can leave
> this part out of the patch if you like and add it back when that work is
> done, it doesn't matter to me.

Thanks for explanation, it's fine as it is.

Best regards,
Krzysztof



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-14 02:01    [W:0.069 / U:0.956 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site