lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/6] mfd: devicetree: bindings: 88pm800: Add DT property for 32KHz output enable
On 13.07.2015 16:24, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday 11 July 2015 12:41 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> W dniu 09.07.2015 o 20:47, Vaibhav Hiremath pisze:
>>> 88PM800 family of device supports output of 32KHz clock (low jitter)
>>> on CLK32K2/3 pin which can be supplied to other peripherals on the
>>> board.
>>>
>>> This patch adds the devicetree binding to enable this feature.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt
>>> index dec842f..ae1311c 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt
>>> @@ -9,6 +9,12 @@ Required parent device properties:
>>> - #interrupt-cells : should be 1.
>>> The cell is the 88pm80x local IRQ number
>>>
>>> +Optional properties :
>>> + - marvell,88pm800-32khz-xolj-out-en : If set, driver will enable
>>> low jitter
>>> + version of 32Khz clock output on
>>
>> I am not sure if I understand it correctly. The hardware always has such
>> clocks and you only want to enable/disable it in DT? Any reasons why
>> these should not be enabled always?
>>
>
> Small amount of Power savings...
> Although currently I do not have power numbers to justify this.
>
> As per spec, (it only talks about power consumption in power down state)
>
> Power-down State => VSYS > 2.8 => 4.5 μA
> CLK32K2 = 0 => 18 μW

This would be a power saving if it could be enabled/disabled runtime.
But with DT you will either:
1. enable it always so there won't be any power saving,
2. disable it always so there won't be such clock.

I can find a use case - when on some boards the clock output is not
wired to anything so it cannot be used. In other cases (there is some
potential user) this should be triggered per-use (runtime enabled/disabled).

Do you have such case? I mean boards where this is not connected at all
and boards where this is used?

>> Enabling it in DT does not look like a job for DT. Maybe you there
>> should be just a clock driver (clock provider)?
>>
>
> It's init time (and one time) settings, wouldn't clock-provider
> be overkill for this?

The clock provider would be a proper way to do it and some PMICs I know
do this. Examples are max77686 and s5m8767/s2mps11. These are PMICs used
for Samsung SoCs. They have two or three 32kHz clocks.

Best regards,
Krzysztof



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-13 09:41    [W:0.056 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site