Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Jun 2015 17:57:01 +0200 | From | Torsten Duwe <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] ppc64 ftrace implementation |
| |
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 11:30:32AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Why are your patches all as replies?
Because I cared too much about the threading and the series that the "Re:" escaped me.
> > Implement ftrace on ppc64 > > What do you mean "Implement ftrace on ppc64"? It's already implemented.
Sorry, too deep in the details. It's DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS, actually. Using gcc's -mprofile-kernel to call into ftrace...
> I'm not even going to bother looking at this patch because I have no > idea what its purpose is.
Understandable ;-)
So: Implement DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS, in order to prepare for live patching. Other obvious things I forgot to mention?
Torsten
| |