Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Jun 2015 17:10:39 +0200 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | [PATCH 0/3] hrtimer: HRTIMER_STATE_ fixes |
| |
On 06/08, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > I tend to agree, but I think its a pre-existing problem, not one > > introduced by my proposed patch. > > Something like this would fix that I think. It fully preserves > timer->state over hrtimer_start_range_ns().
Yes, but I think we can do a bit better.
Only for initial review, I need to re-check this...
And. I think that after you remove STATE_CALLBACK we can even kill timer->state altogether, but this is another story.
What do you think?
Oleg.
| |