lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: drm/amdkfd: bad CONFIG_ prefix for enum entries
On 04.06.2015 17:09, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Valentin Rothberg
> <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Valentin,
>>>> Thanks for catching that.
>>>> I would be grateful if you could fix this yourself.
>>> Please try and keep CONFIG in the name since this range of registers
>>> are called CONFIG registers.
>> I cannot force changing those symbols, but point out that it's
>> violating naming conventions. I would suggest to s/CONFIG_/CONF_/ to
>> make clear that it's config registers. Would you be fine with that?
> What about something like AMD_CONFIG_REG?

For the background: The register headers will be auto generated in the
future and if the hardware designer named the register CONFIG_* the name
will show up in our headers as such.

Prefixing it with AMD_ sounds like a good solution to me, too.

Regards,
Christian.

>
>> Kind regards,
>> Valentin
>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>> Oded
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:45 PM Valentin Rothberg
>>>> <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Yair,
>>>>>
>>>>> your commit fbeb661bfa89 ("drm/amdkfd: Add skeleton H/W debugger
>>>>> module support") has shown up in today's linux-next tree (i.e.,
>>>>> next-20150604). The commit adds the following lines of code to
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_dbgdev.h:
>>>>>
>>>>> +/* CONFIG reg space definition */
>>>>> +enum {
>>>>> + CONFIG_REG_BASE = 0x2000, /* in dwords */
>>>>> + CONFIG_REG_END = 0x2B00,
>>>>> + CONFIG_REG_SIZE = CONFIG_REG_END - CONFIG_REG_BASE
>>>>> +};
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a problem with the 'CONFIG_' prefix of those entries. This
>>>>> prefix is reserved for Kconfig options in Make/Kbuild and CPP syntax,
>>>>> so that static analysis tools (and readers of the code) may mistakenly
>>>>> assume that the symbol is defined somewhere in a Kconfig file.
>>>>>
>>>>> I detected the issue with ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py. Would you
>>>>> mind renaming those entries to something without the 'CONFIG_' prefix?
>>>>> I can also take care of it if you wish to.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> Valentin
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>>>>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-06-04 19:01    [W:0.142 / U:0.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site