Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Nitish Ambastha <> | Subject | [PATCH 1/1] kernel/power/autosleep.c: check for pm_suspend() return before queueing suspend again | Date | Mon, 29 Jun 2015 18:04:57 +0530 |
| |
Prevent tight loop for suspend-resume when some devices failed to suspend If some devices failed to suspend, we monitor this error in try_to_suspend(). pm_suspend() is already an 'int' returning function, how about checking return from pm_suspend() before queueing suspend again?
For devices which do not register for pending events, this will prevent tight loop for suspend-resume in suspend abort scenarios due to device suspend failures
Signed-off-by: Nitish Ambastha <nitish.a@samsung.com> --- kernel/power/autosleep.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/power/autosleep.c b/kernel/power/autosleep.c index 9012ecf..3923148 100644 --- a/kernel/power/autosleep.c +++ b/kernel/power/autosleep.c @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ static struct wakeup_source *autosleep_ws; static void try_to_suspend(struct work_struct *work) { unsigned int initial_count, final_count; + int error = 0; if (!pm_get_wakeup_count(&initial_count, true)) goto out; @@ -45,10 +46,20 @@ static void try_to_suspend(struct work_struct *work) if (autosleep_state >= PM_SUSPEND_MAX) hibernate(); else - pm_suspend(autosleep_state); + error = pm_suspend(autosleep_state); mutex_unlock(&autosleep_lock); + if (error) { + /* + * If some devices failed to suspend, its better to wait + * to prevent system from trying to suspend in tight loop + */ + pr_info("PM: suspend returned (%d)\n", error); + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(HZ / 2); + goto out; + } + if (!pm_get_wakeup_count(&final_count, false)) goto out; -- 1.7.9.5
| |