Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:43:41 +0530 | From | Vaibhav Hiremath <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH-v4 3/3] mfd: devicetree: bindings: Add new 88pm800 mfd binding |
| |
On Friday 26 June 2015 11:35 AM, Yi Zhang wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 03:26:29PM +0800, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >> With addition of DT support to 88pm800 mfd driver, this patch >> adds new DT binding documentation along with respective properties. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..f56b751 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ >> +* Marvell 88PM8xx Power Management IC >> + >> +Required parent device properties: >> +- compatible : "marvell,88pm800", "marvell,88pm805", "marvell,88pm860" >> +- reg : the I2C slave address for the 88pm8xx chip >> +- interrupts : IRQ line for the 88pm8xx chip >> +- interrupt-controller: describes the 88pm8xx as an interrupt controller >> +- #interrupt-cells : should be 1. >> + - The cell is the 88pm8xx local IRQ number >> + >> +88pm8xx family of devices consists of varied group of sub-devices: > what about using "88pm80x family of devices..."? > for we also have another series of chip, with the name of 88pm88x..
I renamed it after Rob's suggestion, but at that time we didn't see 88pm88x coming. But I think now, I should stick to 88pm800 only, as it doesn't make match with both 88pm822 and 88pm860.
Rob, let me know if you think otherwise.
Thanks, Vaibhav
| |