lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4.0 077/105] drm/i915: Dont skip request retirement if the active list is empty
Date
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:34:37AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:29:13AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> >> > 4.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>> >>
>> >> The commit to be backported is already reverted in upstream, and I just
>> >> got an email from you backporting the revert as well... would be best to
>> >> *not* backport either of these:
>> >>
>> >> commit 0aedb1626566efd72b369c01992ee7413c82a0c5
>> >> Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> >> Date: Thu May 28 18:32:36 2015 +0300
>> >>
>> >> drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty
>> >>
>> >> commit 245ec9d85696c3e539b23e210f248698b478379c
>> >> Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> >> Date: Mon Jun 15 12:59:37 2015 +0300
>> >>
>> >> Revert "drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty"
>> >>
>> >> I only marked the revert cc: stable because the original was too.
>> >
>> > This patch is now in 4.0 so what do I suggest I do? Just take these as
>> > well?
>> >
>> > confused,
>>
>> Sorry for confusing you. Please take neither or take both.
>
> So, based on what I have queued up, and what is already released in
> 4.0-stable, we should be fine, right?

Yes. Thanks.

Jani.


--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-06-25 17:41    [W:0.207 / U:0.840 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site