lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 60/71] ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer
Date
3.16.7-ckt14 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>

commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 upstream.

The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority,
so correct it.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com

Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
index 0434ff1b808e..5c98a5a67314 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_init(void)

if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
struct sched_param param = {
- .sched_priority = consumer_fifo
+ .sched_priority = producer_fifo
};
sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
} else

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-06-25 12:21    [W:0.246 / U:0.444 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site