Messages in this thread | | | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | Date | Wed, 24 Jun 2015 13:41:07 -0500 | Subject | Re: kdbus: to merge or not to merge? |
| |
David Lang <david@lang.hm> writes:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> And the thing is, in hindsight, after such huge flamewars, years down the line, >> almost never do I see the following question asked: 'what were we thinking merging >> that crap??'. If any question arises it's usually along the lines of: 'what was >> the big fuss about?'. So I think by and large the process works. > > counterexamples, devfs, tux
The biggest I can think of cgroups.
The way cgroups connect to processes instead of resources (semantically) and the fact that controllers are different from fundamental entities like schedulers.
Of course I don't think "What were we thinking" I remember it all too well in that case.
I think "What do we do now that we have made this mess".
Eric
| |