Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:50:00 +0200 | Subject | Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.1 | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> |
| |
Hi Russell,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:52:13PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven >> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: >> > JFYI, when comparing v4.1[1] to v4.1-rc8[3], the summaries are: >> > - build errors: +44/-7 >> >> + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mm/dump.c: error: >> 'L_PTE_MT_BUFFERABLE' undeclared here (not in a function): => 81:10 >> + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mm/dump.c: error: >> 'L_PTE_MT_DEV_CACHED' undeclared here (not in a function): => 117:10 >> + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mm/dump.c: error: >> 'L_PTE_MT_DEV_NONSHARED' undeclared here (not in a function): => >> 108:10 > > I'm rather ignoring this because I don't see these errors here. This > is one of the problems of just throwing out build reports. With zero > information such as a configuration or a method on how to cause the > errors, it's pretty much worthless to post errors. > > Folk who do build testing need to be smarter, and consider what it's > like to be on the receiving end of their report emails...
Fortunately the kisskb service has good bookkeeping of build logs and configs.
Re-adding the lost URL: >> [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/9038/ (all 254 configs)
1. Open URL in web browser, 2. Click on "Failed", next to "arm-randconfig", 3. Click on "Download", next to "arm-randconfig", 4. Reproduce, 5. Fix, 6. Profit! ;-)
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |