Messages in this thread | | | From | "Luis R. Rodriguez" <> | Subject | [PATCH 0/2] x86/mm/pat: don't use WARN for nopat requirement | Date | Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:31:56 -0700 |
| |
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
Mauro, Doug,
The 0-day robot found using WARN() on built-in kernels confusing. Upon further thought pr_warn() is better and will likely also not confuse humans too.
Boris, provided maintainers Ack, please consider these patches.
These depend on pat_enabled() exported symbol which went in through the x86 tree, so I suppose this also needs to go through there. This is an example issue of cross-tree collateral evolution follow ups, one reason why I punted the a RFD and proposal for a linux-oven [0]. In that regard I suppose follow ups like these would need to go through that tree as well.
[0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150619231255.GC7487@garbanzo.do-not-panic.com
Luis R. Rodriguez (2): x86/mm/pat, drivers/infiniband/ipath: replace WARN() with pr_warn() x86/mm/pat, drivers/media/ivtv: replace WARN() with pr_warn()
drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_driver.c | 6 ++++-- drivers/media/pci/ivtv/ivtvfb.c | 6 ++++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
-- 2.3.2.209.gd67f9d5.dirty
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |