lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subject[PATCH 0/2] x86/mm/pat: don't use WARN for nopat requirement
Date
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>

Mauro, Doug,

The 0-day robot found using WARN() on built-in kernels confusing. Upon
further thought pr_warn() is better and will likely also not confuse
humans too.

Boris, provided maintainers Ack, please consider these patches.

These depend on pat_enabled() exported symbol which went in through
the x86 tree, so I suppose this also needs to go through there. This
is an example issue of cross-tree collateral evolution follow ups,
one reason why I punted the a RFD and proposal for a linux-oven [0].
In that regard I suppose follow ups like these would need to go through
that tree as well.

[0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150619231255.GC7487@garbanzo.do-not-panic.com

Luis R. Rodriguez (2):
x86/mm/pat, drivers/infiniband/ipath: replace WARN() with pr_warn()
x86/mm/pat, drivers/media/ivtv: replace WARN() with pr_warn()

drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_driver.c | 6 ++++--
drivers/media/pci/ivtv/ivtvfb.c | 6 ++++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--
2.3.2.209.gd67f9d5.dirty

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-06-23 00:41    [W:0.125 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site