Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 20 Jun 2015 11:12:23 +0200 (CEST) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [-next] !irqd_can_balance() WARNINGs at irq_move_masked_irq() |
| |
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (06/20/15 10:13), Thomas Gleixner wrote: > [..] > > > > Can you please send me the dmesg of the second patch as well? > > > > > > > > > > I'm sorry, what second patch? > > > > The one which I forgot to append when I replied yesterday. Appended now. > > > [ 0.198654] [<ffffffff8108795c>] irq_set_affinity_locked+0x5b/0xf9 > [ 0.198717] [<ffffffff81087a46>] __irq_set_affinity+0x4c/0x67 > [ 0.198781] [<ffffffff81b1d48c>] setup_ioapic_dest+0xa7/0xbf > [ 0.198843] [<ffffffff810851a4>] ? console_unlock+0x400/0x42f > [ 0.198906] [<ffffffff81b1b1ef>] native_smp_cpus_done+0xa4/0xae > [ 0.198970] [<ffffffff81b2408a>] smp_init+0x75/0x7a
OK. It's setup_ioapic_dest() and I understand now where this all comes from.
One last request. Can you please provide /proc/timer_list and dmesg from a mainline kernel for comparison?
Thanks,
tglx
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |