Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 02 Jun 2015 15:31:30 -0700 | From | nolan <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 3/9] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support for VTU ops |
| |
On 06/02/2015 12:44 AM, Scott Feldman wrote: > That brings up an interesting point about having multiple bridges with > the same vlan configured. I struggled with that problem with rocker > also and I don't have an answer other than "don't do that". Or, > better put, if you have multiple bridge on the same vlan, just use one > bridge for that vlan. Otherwise, I don't know how at the device level > to partition the vlan between the bridges. Maybe that's what Vivien > is facing also? I can see how this works for software-only bridges, > because they should be isolated from each other and independent. But > when offloading to a device which sees VLAN XXX global across the > entire switch, I don't see how we can preserve the bridge boundaries.
Scott,
I'm confused by this. I think you're saying this config is problematic:
br0: eth0.100, eth1.100 br1: eth2.100, eth3.100
But this works fine today.
Could you clarify the issue you're referring to?
Thanks, - nolan
| |