Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:29:45 -0400 | From | Paul Gortmaker <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: include <module.h> for modular exynos-cpufreq.c code |
| |
On 15-06-15 07:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 16.06.2015 08:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wednesday, June 03, 2015 05:18:18 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote: >>> This file is built off of a tristate Kconfig option ("ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ") >>> and also contains modular function calls so it should explicitly include >>> module.h to avoid compile breakage during pending header shuffles. >>> >>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> >>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> >>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> >>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> >>> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org >>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >>> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org >>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> >> >> I'm assuming that this will go in via the Samsung tree. >> >> >>> --- >>> >>> [ patch will be appended to the implicit include fixup series, see: >>> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430444867-22342-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com >>> for the original series posting.] > > Paul, will you handle the patch or should it go through Samsung tree?
I have to keep a copy of the patch in the above series, since if I don't then we'll introduce build failures into the bisection history, so yes I'll handle it.
Thanks, Paul. --
> > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
| |