Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:11:29 +0100 | From | Sudeep Holla <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] irqchip: exynos-combiner: Save IRQ enable set on suspend |
| |
On 16/06/15 13:32, Tomasz Figa wrote: > 2015-06-16 0:00 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>: >> On 06/15/2015 11:01 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
[...]
>>> >>> Agreed. But I would suggest also to add MASK_ON_SUSPEND and >>> set_irq_wake also and then you can restore iff it's non-zero as >>> irq core will take care of most of the non-wakeup sources. >>> Because I am planning to push >> >> I've looking at this and a problem I found is that IIUC the >> set_irq_wake is not propagated from the the Exynos pinctrl / GPIO >> driver which is the combiner's external interrupt source so the >> callback is never called. Which means that right now only the >> state of the wakeup source IRQs can't be saved since that >> information is not present. >> >> The drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c driver enables and >> disables the combiner interrupts but its .irq_set_wake handler >> only updates the wakeup source mask for the external interrupts but >> does not call the combiner .set_irq_wake so that should be changed >> as well. >> > > As far as I'm aware of, wake-up events from pin controllers don't go > through GIC, but rather directly to PMU, which is a dedicated unit > responsible for power management and not a standalone interrupt > controller (well actually I saw a series making it a cascaded > controller some time ago, but I'm not sure if that went in). Based on > this, I don't think we have to call set_irq_wake on GIC. Correct me > if I'm wrong, though.
Thanks for the details, this was my assumption when Doug confirmed that the combiner is also powered down, either there must be some bypass or a dedicated logic to wakeup. But I was not sure though so insisted set_irq_wake but based on what you say it's not required.
Regards, Sudeep
| |