Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq:gx-suspmod - Fix two typos in two comments. | Date | Tue, 16 Jun 2015 01:37:34 +0200 |
| |
On Monday, May 25, 2015 12:51:14 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 23-05-15, 10:36, Shailendra Verma wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c b/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c > > index 1d723dc..3488c9c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c > > @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ module_param(max_duration, int, 0444); > > > > > > /** > > - * we can detect a core multipiler from dir0_lsb > > + * we can detect a core multiplier from dir0_lsb > > * from GX1 datasheet p.56, > > * MULT[3:0]: > > * 0000 = SYSCLK multiplied by 4 (test only) > > @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static int cpufreq_gx_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > > > > /* it needs to be assured that at least one supported frequency is > > * within policy->min and policy->max. If it is not, policy->max > > - * needs to be increased until one freuqency is supported. > > + * needs to be increased until one frequency is supported. > > * policy->min may not be decreased, though. This way we guarantee a > > * specific processing capacity. > > */ > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Queued up for 4.2, thanks!
-- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
| |