lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [Intel-gfx] [BUG, bisect] Re: drm/i915: WARN_ON(dev_priv->mm.busy)
Date
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 01:25:38AM -0700, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
>> Daniel,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 08:57:47AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > Can you please retest with
>> >
>> > commit 0aedb1626566efd72b369c01992ee7413c82a0c5
>> > Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> > Date: Thu May 28 18:32:36 2015 +0300
>> >
>> > drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty
>> >
>> > Thanks, Daniel
>> >
>>
>> The bug is still present with that patch applied. And it is still
>> present up to linux-next 20150611.
>
> The patch was misapplied, so what's in the tree at the moment isn't what
> I sent to the list.

Auch, my bad.

So we should

1) revert

commit 0aedb1626566efd72b369c01992ee7413c82a0c5
Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu May 28 18:32:36 2015 +0300

drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty

in v4.1

and

2) reapply http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/50659 to
drm-intel-next-fixes for v4.2.

Is that right?

BR,
Jani.


>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC

--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-06-15 11:21    [W:1.213 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site