Messages in this thread | | | From | Jani Nikula <> | Subject | Re: [Intel-gfx] [BUG, bisect] Re: drm/i915: WARN_ON(dev_priv->mm.busy) | Date | Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:06:30 +0300 |
| |
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 01:25:38AM -0700, Jeremiah Mahler wrote: >> Daniel, >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 08:57:47AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > Can you please retest with >> > >> > commit 0aedb1626566efd72b369c01992ee7413c82a0c5 >> > Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> >> > Date: Thu May 28 18:32:36 2015 +0300 >> > >> > drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty >> > >> > Thanks, Daniel >> > >> >> The bug is still present with that patch applied. And it is still >> present up to linux-next 20150611. > > The patch was misapplied, so what's in the tree at the moment isn't what > I sent to the list.
Auch, my bad.
So we should
1) revert
commit 0aedb1626566efd72b369c01992ee7413c82a0c5 Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu May 28 18:32:36 2015 +0300
drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty
in v4.1
and
2) reapply http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/50659 to drm-intel-next-fixes for v4.2.
Is that right?
BR, Jani.
> > -- > Ville Syrjälä > Intel OTC
-- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
| |