Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 14 Jun 2015 13:54:08 +0200 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 13/17] x86/tsc: Rename native_read_tsc() to rdtsc_unordered() |
| |
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 11:25:49AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > I could go either way here. rdtsc() is weird because people seem to > forget about the barrier.
Yeah, our job is only to give them enough rope...
> Maybe I'm being unnecessarily paranoid.
You can always slap a comment above the rdtsc() definition saying that people should use the _ordered() version if they wanna order. :)
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --
| |