Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:23:37 -0700 | From | Stephen Boyd <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] clk: fixed: Add comment to clk_fixed_set_rate |
| |
On 06/10, Daniel Thompson wrote: > Currently it is not made explicit why clk_fixed_set_rate() can ignore > its arguments and unconditionally return success. Add a comment > to explain this. > > We also mark the clk_ops table const since it should never be > modified at runtime. > > Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> > ---
Applied to clk-next
-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
| |