Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:46:58 -0400 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer |
| |
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:12:37 +0000 Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com> wrote:
> The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority, > so correct it. > > Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
I also add this for stable 2.6.33+
Thanks, applied.
-- Steve
> --- > kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c > index 13d945c..1b28df2 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c > @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_init(void) > > if (producer_fifo >= 0) { > struct sched_param param = { > - .sched_priority = consumer_fifo > + .sched_priority = producer_fifo > }; > sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m); > } else
| |