lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Please revert 3eea8b5d68c801fec788b411582b803463834752 as it breaks touchscreen on n900.


> > > > The 3eea8b5d68c801fec788b411582b803463834752 is just bad.
> > >
> > > You were very welcome to review this patch at the time and/or suggest
> > > a fix that pleases everyone.
> >
> > You should be the one that should suggest fixes, as you broke it in
> > the first place. But clearly you don't understand that.
>
> You actually never asked for a fix, and went head first calling this
> patch "bad" and asking for nothing but reverting it.

Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 21:08:16 +0200
Subject: 4.1 touchscreen regression on n900 -- pinpointed [was Re:
linux-n900
...
Maxime, can you suggest a fix?
...


> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/of_touchscreen.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/of_touchscreen.c
> index b82b5207c78b..7e98c2e443ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/of_touchscreen.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/of_touchscreen.c
> @@ -14,10 +14,10 @@
> #include <linux/input/mt.h>
> #include <linux/input/touchscreen.h>
>
> -static u32 of_get_optional_u32(struct device_node *np,
> +static int of_get_optional_u32(struct device_node *np,
> const char *property)
> {
> - u32 val = 0;
> + int val = -1;
>
> of_property_read_u32(np, property, &val);
>
> @@ -42,8 +42,12 @@ static void touchscreen_set_params(struct input_dev *dev,
> }
>
> absinfo = &dev->absinfo[axis];
> - absinfo->maximum = max;
> - absinfo->fuzz = fuzz;
> +
> + if (max >= 0)
> + absinfo->maximum = max;
> +
> + if (fuzz >= 0)
> + absinfo->fuzz = fuzz;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -57,7 +61,7 @@ static void touchscreen_set_params(struct input_dev *dev,
> void touchscreen_parse_of_params(struct input_dev *dev)
> {
> struct device_node *np = dev->dev.parent->of_node;
> - u32 maximum, fuzz;
> + int maximum, fuzz;
>
> input_alloc_absinfo(dev);
> if (!dev->absinfo)
> -- >8 --
>
> That reduces the max size of the screens, but I don't really expect the screen
> size to reach that order of magnitude before a few years...

Umm. Won't you have to update

- if (maximum || fuzz)
+ if (maximum >= 0 || fuzz >= 0)

? Thanks,

Pavel

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-06-01 18:01    [W:0.092 / U:16.272 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site