Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 9 May 2015 08:50:30 +0200 | From | Wolfram Sang <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] i2c-tools: i2ctransfer: add new tool |
| |
Hi Jean,
> If you think it's not enough, then the address modifier could go > separately before or after the address byte, i.e. either r1@0x123t or > r1@t0x123. I suspect that the latter should be easier to implement.
In deed, I would aim for maximum flexibility (i.e. possible to mix 7 and 10 bit addresses), and implement the latter proposal of yours.
> > Handling R/W as "just another" flag made this option extremly simple. > > But we probably can work something out. > > I think the proposal above makes more sense than grouping it with the > direction letter (r or w)
I agree.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |