lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [V3 PATCH 3/5] device property: Introduces device_dma_is_coherent()
Date
On Friday, May 08, 2015 01:27:00 PM santosh shilimkar wrote:
> On 5/8/2015 1:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 07, 2015 09:12:00 PM santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com wrote:
> >> On 5/7/15 5:37 PM, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> >>> Currently, device drivers, which support both OF and ACPI,
> >>> need to call two separate APIs, of_dma_is_coherent() and
> >>> acpi_dma_is_coherent()) to determine device coherency attribute.
> >>>
> >>> This patch simplifies this process by introducing a new device
> >>> property API, device_dma_is_coherent(), which calls the appropriate
> >>> interface based on the booting architecture.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/base/property.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> >>> include/linux/property.h | 2 ++
> >>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
> >>> index 1d0b116..8123c6e 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/base/property.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/base/property.c
> >>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> >>> #include <linux/export.h>
> >>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> >>> #include <linux/of.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> >>> #include <linux/property.h>
> >>>
> >>> /**
> >>> @@ -519,3 +520,14 @@ unsigned int device_get_child_node_count(struct device *dev)
> >>> return count;
> >>> }
> >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_child_node_count);
> >>> +
> >>> +bool device_dma_is_coherent(struct device *dev)
> >>> +{
> >>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node)
> >>
> >> Do you really need that IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) ?
> >> In other words, dev->of_node should be null for !CONFIG_OF
> >
> > Yes, but IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) causes the check to be optimized away by the
> > compiler if CONFIG_OF is not enabled.
> >
> Sure but my point was why you need it when just 'dev->of_node' check
> is enough. May be I missed something.

dev->of_node is present when CONFIG_OF is not enabled too. Without the
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) this becomes a pointless pointer check that will
always evaluate to 'false' on systems without CONFIG_OF, AFAICS.


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-08 22:41    [W:0.055 / U:16.988 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site