lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] clk samsung exynos5420 add CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag to mout_apll and mout_kpll clock.
Hi Krysztof,

Actually the patch is based on https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/389
I don't know how to measure the energy consumption when compared to
cpufreq-exynos.

I will update the commit log and resend it with you review.

-Anand Moon




On 8 May 2015 at 05:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> wrote:
> 2015-05-08 2:48 GMT+09:00 Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>:
>> Addition of CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag to support Exynos5 cpu clk so that
>> correct divider values are re-calculated after both pre/post
>> clock notifiers had run for for mout_apll clock and mout_kpll clock.
> s/for for/for/
>
> Could you precise in commit message the observational effects
> *without* this patch? In other words: what is fixed? The divider will
> have incorrect values?
>
>>
>> Depend on https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/388
>>
>> Tested on OdroidXU3 Board.
>
> Thanks for providing this information. However
> 1. Patch dependency should not be part of commit message, It simply
> won't provide any meaningful information when they are merged.
> 2. Similarly testing platform also is not always put in commit message.
>
> So just put them after separator (triple-dash).
>
> After fixing the commit message:
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-08 06:41    [W:0.031 / U:24.956 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site