Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 5 May 2015 11:01:23 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched: cpufreq_cfs: pelt-based cpu frequency scaling |
| |
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 03:10:41PM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote: > For those that are very curious, there were recently two previous > postings of these patches to the public eas-dev mailing list. Of > interest in those threads is the discussion around using a utilization > threadhold versus purely matching frequency to capacity utilization > versus using a margin (as this series does): > > https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/eas-dev/2015-April/000074.html > https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/eas-dev/2015-April/000115.html >
So why wasn't that done here? (and on linux-pm of course)
| |