Messages in this thread | | | From | Rob Herring <> | Date | Tue, 5 May 2015 14:32:44 -0500 | Subject | Re: [Celinux-dev] Invitation and RFC: Linux Plumbers Device Tree track proposed |
| |
+Ian
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > Hi Rob > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> wrote: >>> On 04/11/2015 02:20 PM, Rowand, Frank wrote: >>>> In recent years there have been proposed tools to aid in the creation of valid >>>> device trees and in debugging device tree issues. An example of this is the >>>> various approaches proposed (with source code provided) to validate device tree >>>> source against valid bindings. As of today, device tree related tools, >>>> techniques, and debugging infrastructure have not progressed very far. I have >>>> submitted a device tree related proposal for the Linux Plumbers 2015 conference >>>> to spur action and innovation in such tools, techniques, and debugging >>>> infrastructure. >>>> >>>> The current title of the track is "Device Tree Tools, Validation, and >>>> Troubleshooting". The proposal is located at >>>> >>>> http://wiki.linuxplumbersconf.org/2015:device_tree_tools_validation_and_trouble_shooting >>> >>> Want I want to do is: >>> >>> 1) Download an archive of device tree files describing a bunch of >>> boards. (Both dts and corresponding dtb files, with maybe a .txt telling >>> me about the board and the -append line qemu needs to give it any >>> board-specific kernel command line stuff like "console=myserialport".) >> >> The dts half is here[1]. It is a kernel repository automatically >> stripped of everything but dts files. >> >> [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/devicetree/devicetree-rebasing.git/ > > Great! > > While "git log" has the "--nomerges" option, cgit hasn't, making it hard to see > the actual changes through the forest of merges. > > Any chance merge commits not causing any changes can be stripped out, too?
That's a question for Ian.
Rob
| |