[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 207/208] x86/fpu: Add FPU performance measurement subsystem
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 12:15:00PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 05/05/2015 10:58 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > x86/fpu: Cost of: XSAVE insn : 104 cycles
> > x86/fpu: Cost of: XRSTOR insn : 80 cycles
> Isn't there going to be pretty huge variability here depending on how
> much state you are xsave/xrstor'ing and if the init/modified
> optimizations are in play?

If this is a module, one could modprobe/rmmod it multiple times for
an average. But yeah, it would depend in the end on what the system
does/has been doing in the recent past and thus how much state has been


ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-05 22:01    [W:0.129 / U:11.380 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site