Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 04 May 2015 18:08:28 +0200 | From | Gaël PORTAY <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91/dt: drop deprecated mainck node from pmc |
| |
On 16/04/2015 14:45, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:25:44 +0200 > Gaël PORTAY <g.portay@overkiz.com> wrote: > >> The clock-frequency property became obsolete since the rework of the main >> clock driver in 3.16 (see commit 27cb1c2083373a44130d50d4d2fb64cf7eff2d90). >> >> It now get and uses the clock-frequency from the main_xtal node. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gaël PORTAY <g.portay@overkiz.com> > Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> > >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d3_xplained.dts | 6 ------ >> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rlek.dts | 6 ------ >> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xcm.dtsi | 6 ------ >> 3 files changed, 18 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d3_xplained.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d3_xplained.dts >> index fec1fca..1721e9b 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d3_xplained.dts >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d3_xplained.dts >> @@ -204,12 +204,6 @@ >> }; >> }; >> }; >> - >> - pmc: pmc@fffffc00 { >> - main: mainck { >> - clock-frequency = <12000000>; >> - }; >> - }; >> }; >> >> nand0: nand@60000000 { >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rlek.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rlek.dts >> index 9be5b54..d9299be3 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rlek.dts >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rlek.dts >> @@ -181,12 +181,6 @@ >> }; >> }; >> >> - pmc: pmc@fffffc00 { >> - main: mainck { >> - clock-frequency = <12000000>; >> - }; >> - }; >> - >> watchdog@fffffd40 { >> status = "okay"; >> }; >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xcm.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xcm.dtsi >> index 7d6babd..ef404e9 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xcm.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xcm.dtsi >> @@ -67,12 +67,6 @@ >> rxd3-skew-ps = <400>; >> }; >> }; >> - >> - pmc: pmc@fffffc00 { >> - main: mainck { >> - clock-frequency = <12000000>; >> - }; >> - }; >> }; >> >> nand0: nand@60000000 { >>
Hi everyone,
Any news about this patch ?
Best regards, Gaël PORTAY
PS: I hope this mail does not sound insistent :)
| |