lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v2] rtc: pcf8563 fix: return -EINVAL if we read an invalid time.
On 31/05/2015 at 00:16:39 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote :
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Jan Kardell <jan.kardell@telliq.com> wrote:
> > Return -EINVAL if the voltage low bit is set to avoid getting a bogus
> > time at boot.
> > There was a comment stating that util-linux hwclock refuses to set a
> > new time if we return an error code on read, but at least the current
> > version do set the time as expected. Remove the comment and the check
> > for valid time, and let the rtc core check it for us.
> >
> > Changes in v2: Remove the test for invalid time. Change dev_err to
> > dev_info when voltage low is set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kardell <jan.kardell@telliq.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c | 9 ++-------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c
> > index 0ba7e59..6ce0a86 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c
> > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > #include <linux/err.h>
> >
> > -#define DRV_VERSION "0.4.3"
> > +#define DRV_VERSION "0.4.4"
>
> Why do you need that?
> Isn't the kernel version enough? :)
>

That's also what I'm thinking but I don't care enough to ask people to
remove those.

--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-31 00:41    [W:0.079 / U:2.156 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site