Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 31 May 2015 00:21:42 +0200 | From | Alexandre Belloni <> | Subject | Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v2] rtc: pcf8563 fix: return -EINVAL if we read an invalid time. |
| |
On 31/05/2015 at 00:16:39 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote : > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Jan Kardell <jan.kardell@telliq.com> wrote: > > Return -EINVAL if the voltage low bit is set to avoid getting a bogus > > time at boot. > > There was a comment stating that util-linux hwclock refuses to set a > > new time if we return an error code on read, but at least the current > > version do set the time as expected. Remove the comment and the check > > for valid time, and let the rtc core check it for us. > > > > Changes in v2: Remove the test for invalid time. Change dev_err to > > dev_info when voltage low is set. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kardell <jan.kardell@telliq.com> > > --- > > drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c | 9 ++------- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c > > index 0ba7e59..6ce0a86 100644 > > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c > > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c > > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ > > #include <linux/of.h> > > #include <linux/err.h> > > > > -#define DRV_VERSION "0.4.3" > > +#define DRV_VERSION "0.4.4" > > Why do you need that? > Isn't the kernel version enough? :) >
That's also what I'm thinking but I don't care enough to ask people to remove those.
-- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
| |