lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 09/15] perf probe: Support $params without debuginfo
On 5/29/15 4:55 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On 2015/05/29 15:30, He Kuang wrote:
>> hi, Alexei
>>
>> On 2015/5/29 2:10, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>> On 5/28/15 6:01 AM, He Kuang wrote:
>>>>> I don't think you can break it down in two steps like this.
>>>>>> There is no such thing as 'calling regs'. x86_32 with ax,dx,cx
>>>>>> are not 'calling regs'. 64-bit values will be passed in a pair.
>>>>>> Only 'pt_regs + arch + func_proto + asmlinkage' makes sense
>>>>> >from the user point of view.
>>>>>> Adding 'asmlinkage' attr is also trivial.
>>>>>> 'func(long, char) asmlinkage' is easy to parse and the user
>>>> I think at this early stage, we could make our bpf variable
>>>> prologue work with debuginfo while keeping bpf 'SEC' syntax
>>>> consistent with original perf probe. After all, we can use
>>>> pt_regs directly or relay to perf-probe cache by Masami to deal
>>>> with non-debug cases.
>>>
>>> so you're saying you don't want to support non-debug case for now?
>>> Sure, as long as section name parser will be able to support
>>> 'func(long, char) asmlinkage' syntax in the future without breaking
>>> compatibility. I'm mostly interested in cases when debug info
>>> is not available at all. So perf-probe cache is of no use to me.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Yes, that syntax do deal with the situation which current 'perf
>> probe' syntax not covered, so not only bpf prologue would benifit
>> from that, maybe we could try to let perf probe involve that.
>
> Hmm, then how about below syntax?
>
> perf probe x86_acpi_enter_sleep_state $regparams:asmlinkage(char)
>
> So, regparams has following synopsis.
>
> $regparams[:[asmlinkage|0-6]([u8|u16|u32|u64|ptr][,...])]

the number doesn't make sense in generic command. Only x86_32 plays
with calling convention. All other archs are not doing anything special
for asmlinkage.
I think the following is enough:
$regparams[[:asmlinkage]([u8|u16|u32|u64|ptr|char|short|long|
long long|void*][,...])]
asmlinkage most of the time won't be used and typical command will look
like: 'func=func $regparams(char, long, void*)'
which is ok for kprobe.
For bpf section name I would still prefer 'func(char, long, void*)'
since it's more concise, easier to remember, more similar to C declaration.

> Note that asmlinkage is a synonym of 0, and default depends on arch :)
> Some architecture ignores this part, e.g. x86_64 always uses regs.
> And it is automatically expanded to argX="%reg or $stackX".
>
> e.g.
> $regparams is expanded to
> arg1=%di arg2=%si arg3=%dx arg4=%cx arg5=%r8 arg6=%r9 (on x86_64)
> arg1=%ax arg2=%dx arg3=%cx arg4=$stack1 arg5=$stack2 arg6=$stack3 (on i386)
>
> $regparams:0 is expanded to
> arg1=%di arg2=%si arg3=%dx arg4=%cx arg5=%r8 arg6=%r9 (on x86_64)
> arg1=$stack1 arg2=$stack2 arg3=$stack3 arg4=$stack4 arg5=$stack5 arg6=$stack6 (on i386)
>
> $regparams:3(char,long) is expanded to
> arg1=%di:s8 arg2=%si:s64 (on x86_64)
> arg1=%ax:s8 arg2=%dx:s64 (on i386)
>
> How is this?
>
> Thank you,
>
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-30 04:01    [W:0.092 / U:25.696 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site