lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the modules and tip trees
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:56:04AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:25:07PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
> > > include/linux/rcupdate.h between commits 0a04b0166929 ("rcu: Move
> > > lockless_dereference() out of rcupdate.h") from the modules tree and
> > > c1ad348b452a ("tick: Nohz: Rework next timer evaluation") from the tip
> > > tree and commits 7d0ae8086b82 ("rcu: Convert ACCESS_ONCE() to
> > > READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE()") and 3382adbc1bb8 ("rcu: Eliminate a few
> > > CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL #ifdefs") from the rcu tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> > > is required).
> >
> > Thank you, Stephen!
> >
> > Ingo, I can send you a pull request as is or I can merge c1ad348b452a
> > with v4.1-rc3, rebase my commits on top of that, and do another cycle
> > through -next. If I don't hear otherwise, I will be lazy and send as is,
> > so if you would prefer something different, please let me know.
>
> I think as-is would be better, to not create extra dependencies. I can resolve
> conflicts in -tip.

Very good! I expect to send the pull request tomorrow (Saturday)
Pacific time.

Thanx, Paul



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-29 15:21    [W:0.077 / U:6.104 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site