lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 00/10] latched RB-trees and __module_address()
Date
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:37:17AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> That's rcu_read_lock_sched_held, not rcu_held_lock_sched_held().
>>
>> Also, your unlikely is weird and backwards.
>>
>> I changed it as below, and folded. It's in modules-next.
>>
>> I'm now going to do some *actual* testing, and I'll go all Torvalds on
>> you if this spews warnings...
>
> Fair enough, I did see the build robot fail on this. How come those only
> showed up now? This patch has been in your git tree for a long time; you
> picked up the rcu validation patches before the other ones.

Indeed...

Fengguang, is the kbuild test robot checking my pending-rebases tree?
It's probably going to produce some noise (since that's where I drop
unreviewed patches, too), but that's OK.

Thanks,
Rusty.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-29 03:21    [W:0.068 / U:1.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site