Messages in this thread | | | From | KY Srinivasan <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH net-next 1/1] hv_netvsc: Properly size the vrss queues | Date | Thu, 28 May 2015 13:52:47 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@oracle.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:06 AM > To: KY Srinivasan > Cc: davem@davemloft.net; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; olaf@aepfle.de; > apw@canonical.com; jasowang@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] hv_netvsc: Properly size the vrss queues > > Since you're redoing this anyway. > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:21:09PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/hyperv_net.h > b/drivers/net/hyperv/hyperv_net.h > > index ddcc7f8..dd45440 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/hyperv_net.h > > +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/hyperv_net.h > > @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ struct netvsc_device_info { > > unsigned char mac_adr[ETH_ALEN]; > > bool link_state; /* 0 - link up, 1 - link down */ > > int ring_size; > > + u32 max_num_vrss_chns; > > We (Joe and I) have commented before that long names don't mix well with > the 80 character limit. You could just leave the "num_" out. Almost > all variables are numbers in C so it doesn't add anything.
Thanks Dan. Actually I sent out the revised patch yesterday and I currently don't Have the 80 char issue. If it is ok with Dave, I will not re-spin the patch. However, I will note this comment for future work.
K. Y > > regards, > dan carpenter
| |