lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH RESEND] sched: prefer an idle cpu vs an idle sibling for BALANCE_WAKE
From
Date
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 10:49 +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:

> Isn't sd == NULL is most cases if you don't move the sd assignment
> before the affine_sd assignment?

sd will usually be NULL regardless of where the assignment is, as
SD_BALANCE_WAKE is usually off in ->flags. Josef is turning it on.

-Mike



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-28 13:41    [W:0.209 / U:0.272 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site