lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] staging: gdm72xx: remove unneeded test
From
Date
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 10:33 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2015, Joe Perches wrote:
> I think these are very equivalent style to
> > the repeated:
> >
> > ret = foo();
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> > ...
> > ret = bar();
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
> > return ret;
> >
> > and people seem to prefer changing those.
>
> Maybe if there is a whole sequence of them, it it is reasonable to keep
> them. But if there is just one, it seems complicated for nothing.

Agree with that.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/2/321

> In the
> big scheme of things, though, there are probably better things one could
> do than changing all of them.

Agree with that too.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-28 11:21    [W:0.036 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site