Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 May 2015 19:37:30 +0200 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 04/10] perf, tools, report: Add processing for cycle histograms |
| |
> hum, so this is assuming that having cycles fort 1st entry > means there'll be for the rest? > Also in that case why is there the '!= cycles' check within > addr_map_symbol__account_cycles ? > It means there might be. It's just a short cut. But rarely branches may still have 0 cycles, so it still needs to be checked later.
In theory it could miss a valid one if the first happened to be zero, but that seems very unlikely.
-Andi
-- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
| |