Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 May 2015 13:49:50 -0000 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs-qcom: fix compilation warning if compiled as a module | From | ygardi@codeauro ... |
| |
> On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 16:47 +0300, Yaniv Gardi wrote: >> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c >> @@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ out: >> >> #define ANDROID_BOOT_DEV_MAX 30 >> static char android_boot_dev[ANDROID_BOOT_DEV_MAX]; >> -static int get_android_boot_dev(char *str) >> +static int __maybe_unused get_android_boot_dev(char *str) >> { >> strlcpy(android_boot_dev, str, ANDROID_BOOT_DEV_MAX); >> return 1; > > Wouldn't it be clearer to wrap these few lines (until after the > __setup() macro) with #ifndef MODULE? > > And I think get_android_boot_dev() could be marked __init. Because if > it's built-in it will never be called after the kernel has finished > booting, right? >
That's correct. I will upload an update to this patch. I accept both comments #ifndef MODULE is indeed clearer and __init flag as well, since get_android_boot_dev() will not be called again after booting finished.
> > Paul Bolle > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
| |