Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 May 2015 19:34:27 +0300 | From | Petko Manolov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 10/8] modsign: Allow password to be specified for signing key |
| |
On 15-05-19 17:15:12, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 18:50 +0300, Petko Manolov wrote: > > On 15-05-19 15:45:58, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > We don't want this in the Kconfig since it might then get exposed in > > > /proc/config.gz. So make it a parameter to Kbuild instead. This also > > > means we don't have to jump through hoops to strip quotes from it, as > > > we would if it was a config option. > > > > If it were on a network-less, secure sign/build server i'd say it is OK. > > > > However, exposing your private key's password in an environment variable on a > > regular Linux box is a bit fishy. > > I don't quite understand the objection. > > If you want the modules to be signed with an external key of your > choice, then for the duration of the 'make modules_sign' run (or 'make > modules_install if CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_ALL=y) surely the password has to > be available *somehow*? > > You are, of course, free to sign the modules by invoking sign-file > directly. In which case you *still* need to provide it with the password > for the key somehow, if there is one. > > Mimi quite rightly pointed out that my original mechanism for this, a > CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY_PASSWORD option, was inadvertently exposing it > more than was necessary. > > As it is now, you *only* need it in the environment for the duration of > the operations that actually *use* it.
As with everything there is bad and good side to your proposal.
bad: - password in environment variable _could_ be very dangerous; - someone is bound to misuse this feature sooner or later;
good: - the actual risk is mitigated as the key is very short-lived; - the feature is going to be used by a small number of people; - does not break automated builds, maybe; - there is an alternative for those who want more secure approach;
> Do you have a better suggestion?
*better* is a matter of prospective. Security and convenience are at the wrong side of the spectrum relative to each other. :)
Don't get me wrong, your patch is perhaps the lesser evil. I just wanted to bring up my concerns.
cheers, Petko
| |