Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 May 2015 21:55:49 -0300 | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf tools: Fix data_read_offset() file opening |
| |
Em Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:44:37AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:58:43PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > > On 19/05/2015 5:48 p.m., Namhyung Kim wrote: > > >Hi Adrian, > > > > > >On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 04:05:46PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > > >>Patch "perf tools: Protect dso cache fd with a mutex" > > >>changed data_file_size() to open the data file if it > > >>was not open. > > >> > > >>data_read_offset() was calling data_file_size() to read > > >>the data file size, but data_file_size() can fail to > > >>open the file because the binary_type has not been set up. > > >> > > >>The correct function to call is dso__data_size() which > > >>uses dso__data_fd() to open the file correctly. > > > > > >Right, but I worried about the locking overhead. By using > > >dso__data_size() it'll call dso__data_fd() everytime which grabs the > > >dso__data_open_lock that is a global mutex. It can be a performance > > >bottleneck on multi-thread report IMHO. > > > > > >I assumed that correct code should check the data fd or size before > > >calling read function as I read the comment in dso.h file. > > > > > >What about adding the missing check in a proper place instead? > > > > It looks to me like you need to change data_file_size() and > > dso_cache__read() so that they open the fd properly i.e. call > > dso__data_fd() instead of open_dso(). > > OK, I'll change it to have a proper binary type before calling > open_dso() like dso__data_fd() does. But I still think it's good to > open data fd explicitly before reading from dso cache. > > > > > > dso__data_fd() should not be taking a lock because the lock must > > be held while the fd in being used. > > > > Perhaps there should be dso__get_fd() and dso__put_fd() that lock/open > > and the unlock. > > That is already a part of my patchset but not merged yet.
Ok, I have Adrian's patch in my perf/core branch, tomorrow I'll check what you guys ended up agreeing on so that I can do the adjustments before pushing to Ingo, ok?
> > But I will have to leave this to you because I am snowed with > > my own problems. > > No problem. I can see you're doing hardwork ;-)
:-)
- Arnaldo
| |