[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] net: ll_temac: Use one return statement instead of two
On 05/11/2015 05:39 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 17:26 +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 05/11/2015 04:42 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 16:05 +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>> Use one return statement instead of two to simplify the code.
>>>> Both are returning the same value.
>>> trivia and FYI:
>> But still correct right?
> Yes.

Does this mean that you have added me your ACK?

>>> I think there are about 100 of these in kernel tree
>>> and I'm not going to submit patches.
>>> $ grep-2.5.4 -rP --include=*.[ch] -n "^([\t]+)\treturn[ \t]+([A-Za-z0-9\_\>\(\)\.\>\[\]\-]+);\n(\1}\n)?\1return[ \t]+\2;" * | \
>>> grep -P "^[\w\/\.]+:\d+:"
>> Are you suggesting that someone else should send patches for it?
> I get enough grief for doing style oriented patches,
> so if someone else wants to, sure.

yep - the only reason I have submitted this was that this is the diff in
the xilinx tree compare to mainline and I don't want to simple revert it
because it is correct.

>> I expect that this is something what Julia can check with coccinelle
>> and can be added to scripts folder.
> Maybe true.
> A coccinelle script might be rather more complicated
> than the simpler grep above, but perhaps the script
> could be a bit more complete as it could likely look
> at more code indentation styles.

Julia: Any comment?


 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-11 18:21    [W:0.059 / U:7.048 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site