lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH V2] rcu: change function declaration to bool
Date
rcu_cpu_has_callbacks() is declared int but is actually returning bool and
and as the function description states " * Return true if the specified
CPU has any callback....", this probably should be a bool. All (3)
call-sites currently treat it as bool so the declaration.


Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>
---

V2: fixed up commit message and tool infos as requested by
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

Type-checking coccinelle spatches are being used to locate type
mismatches between function signatures and return values.
./kernel/rcu/tree.c:3538 WARNING: return of wrong type
int != bool,

Patch was compile tested with x86_64_defconfig (implies CONFIG_TREE_RCU=y)

Patch is against 4.1-rc3 (localversion-next is -next-20150511)

kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index bcc5943..599550c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3516,7 +3516,7 @@ static int rcu_pending(void)
* non-NULL, store an indication of whether all callbacks are lazy.
* (If there are no callbacks, all of them are deemed to be lazy.)
*/
-static int __maybe_unused rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(bool *all_lazy)
+static bool __maybe_unused rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(bool *all_lazy)
{
bool al = true;
bool hc = false;
--
1.7.10.4


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-11 18:01    [W:0.043 / U:16.680 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site