lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 7/7] preempt: Remove PREEMPT_ACTIVE unmasking off in_atomic()
Date
Now that PREEMPT_ACTIVE implies PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET, ignoring
PREEMPT_ACTIVE from in_atomic() check isn't useful anymore.

Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/preempt.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/preempt.h b/include/linux/preempt.h
index 4057696..a1a00e1 100644
--- a/include/linux/preempt.h
+++ b/include/linux/preempt.h
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
* used in the general case to determine whether sleeping is possible.
* Do not use in_atomic() in driver code.
*/
-#define in_atomic() ((preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE) != 0)
+#define in_atomic() (preempt_count() != 0)

/*
* Check whether we were atomic before we did preempt_disable():
--
2.1.4


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-11 17:41    [W:0.059 / U:4.952 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site