Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 May 2015 14:53:53 +0200 | From | Christian Borntraeger <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] kvm: irqchip: Break up high order allocations of kvm_irq_routing_table |
| |
Am 11.05.2015 um 14:50 schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
> s390 has a route per device, but with 100 virtio-blk devices the difference seem > pretty much on the "dont care" side. qemu aio-poll/drain code seems to cause > much more delay since we elimited the kernel delays by using > synchronize_srcu_expedited.
This is ambiguous: My point is: qemu did not get slower, it was already slow and the kernel got fast enough that it is no longer the slowest part.
| |